Reading

For Those of You “Balled Up” over No-Maj

“No-Maj” is the American word for “Muggle” – one who has no magical capabilities. No-Maj is then simply a shortened form of “no magic.” Ever since the American word for muggle was debuted to the public, people reacted to it the way one would to “moist” or “warm kiss.” People have said that it sounds cheap, as if J.K. Rowling gave no thought to the American version of wizard slang.

But there’s a reason it sounds so cheap.

Let’s keep in mind the context in which this word was created. “No-Maj” was created for the upcoming movie Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. This movie is set in 1920s America, which is known for its particular language – most notably, its cheap slang. Let’s look at some examples (from The Internet Guide to Jazz Age Slang):

Abe’s Cabe – Five dollar bill
Busthead – Homemade liquor
Egg – A person who lives the big life
Flivver – A Model T or a broken down car
Floorflusher – An insatiable dancer
Iron One’s Shoelaces – To go to the bathroom
Juice Joint – A speakeasy
Kale – Money
Noodle Juice – Tea
Ossified – Drunk
Phonus Balonus – Nonsense
Sockdollager – An action having a great impact
Splifficated – Drunk
Wet Blanket – Killjoy
Zozzled – Drunk

Just look at the words above – they sound silly and cheap and yet have an air of fun, and No-Maj fits right in. Slang is supposed to be cheap – it’s a cheapened form of formal language! Don’t believe me? Say the words listed one right after the other without their definition, and end the list with No-Maj.

Is it likely that No-Maj would be used in the United States in the 21st century? Most definitely not (Would “Magic not on point” be a substitute?). But in this context, No-Maj fits in perfectly.

Thus, No-Maj is not phonus balonus. Don’t be a wet blanket.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “For Those of You “Balled Up” over No-Maj

  1. What a refreshing way to look at it. I admit I was sceptical at first. It didn’t bother me as much as it seems to have most people, I just thought it was uncharacteristic of Rowling, in a very MILD way, of course, and carried on with my life. I think what you have said about it fitting right in with the slang of the time is a perfect justification of her choice and frankly, at the end of the day, the writer and creator of the world gets to decide what everything should be called. Now to look forward to this movie! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! Rowling has always done a lot of research with names and in the beginning, I too thought no-maj was strange. But then I realized so did the rest of 20s slang! I can’t wait to see the movie!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s